• RSS
  • Twitter
  • FaceBook

Virtualization Forums

Forums | Register | Login | My Profile | Inbox | RSS RSS icon | My Subscription | My Forums | Address Book | Member List | Search | FAQ | Ticket List | Log Out

(Almost) Never use RAID 0 for production

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Microsoft Virtualization] >> Storage Management >> (Almost) Never use RAID 0 for production Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
(Almost) Never use RAID 0 for production - 31.Jul.2011 6:19:43 PM   
Scott Lowe

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 13.May2010
Status: offline
Recently, as I was perusing some forums, I ran across a post outlining a user’s Hyper-V setup. In his post, the person outlined his existing Hyper-V setup in which he stated that his company uses RAID 0 for the Hyper-V system because it gives the best performance. However, use of RAID 0 carries with it massive risks. Despite the fact that “0” is a “RAID” level and the acronym RAID includes the work “redundant” when it comes to RAID 0, nothing could be further from the truth. With RAID 0, all data is striped across all of the disks that make up the RAID set. Because multiple disks are used, there is, indeed, a performance increase. However, there is also exactly zero data protection in place. The loss of a single drive will result in the loss of all data on the RAID 0 set.

In the title, I indicated that you should almost never use RAID 0 in production. I try my very best to avoid definitives, but I can’t think of too many situations that would force me to assume significantly increased risk for a bit of additional performance.
Post #: 1
RE: (Almost) Never use RAID 0 for production - 29.Aug.2011 6:19:23 PM   
finstour

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 29.Aug.2011
Status: offline
thanks good post)

(in reply to Scott Lowe)
Post #: 2
RE: (Almost) Never use RAID 0 for production - 12.Sep.2011 1:16:37 PM   
georgec

 

Posts: 28
Joined: 16.Nov.2010
Status: offline
Hi Scott,
Generally, I would agree with your recommendation but I wouldn’t exclude the use of RAID 0 in some specific situations where performance beats redundancy. For instance, you might find a scenario where hosted VMs are identical and do not store data, and the system configuration never changes. A backup image of the VM and Hyper-V may be available to restore the whole setup if a drive fails! The company may live with a recovery process of a couple of hours but may need the best performance of their VMs when they are running! I can’t recall any specific situation but I guess these kinds of situations may exist.

(in reply to finstour)
Post #: 3
RE: (Almost) Never use RAID 0 for production - 2.Oct.2011 11:33:28 PM   
Scott Lowe

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 13.May2010
Status: offline
George,

Good points. If the data is replicated or copied in some way, then RAID 0 is a good choice is performance is key.

Scott

(in reply to georgec)
Post #: 4

Page:   [1] << Older Topic    Newer Topic >>
All Forums >> [Microsoft Virtualization] >> Storage Management >> (Almost) Never use RAID 0 for production Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



Receive all the latest articles by email!

Receive Real-Time & Monthly VirtualizationAdmin.com article updates in your mailbox. Enter your email below!

Become a VirtualizationAdmin.com member!

Discuss all your Virtualization issues with thousands of other experts. Click here to join!